Backchannels home
HomePricing
ResourcesWho uses whatFree toolsBlog
LinkedIn

Dynatrace vs Ubuntu: who evaluates each

Updated

In our data, 12 companies have people who reviewed both Dynatrace and Ubuntu: 5% of the 235 companies whose people reviewed Dynatrace, and 4% of the 337 that reviewed Ubuntu.

How many companies evaluated both

Dynatrace only
223
companies
Both
12
companies
Ubuntu only
325
companies

Only 12 companies evaluated both Dynatrace and Ubuntu, suggesting that buyers typically assess them for different purposes within infrastructure and operations. With 5% of Dynatrace reviewers also examining Ubuntu, the products address distinct needs rather than direct feature parity.

Who reviews each, by team

Dynatrace and Ubuntu, in contacts
DynatraceUbuntu
Sales41%21%
Marketing21%72%
Engineering & IT18164%24266%
Operations & Finance166%185%
Consulting & Analysis4415%5615%
Leadership238%134%
Other145%318%

Engineering & IT teams dominate reviews for both products, but Ubuntu drew significantly more Consulting & Analysis reviewers (56 vs 44), while Dynatrace attracted more Operations & Finance attention (16 vs 18).

What else they compared

Try Backchannels free

Reach the 223 companies that reviewed Dynatrace but not Ubuntu

Open the list in the app, filtered to exactly those companies, and unlock the contacts you want.

Build this list free

Or the 325 that reviewed Ubuntu but not Dynatrace →

No credit card. Preview before you spend a credit.

Frequently asked questions

How many companies reviewed only Dynatrace?
223 companies evaluated Dynatrace without reviewing Ubuntu, indicating a substantial buyer base focused on Dynatrace's specific capabilities.
Which product was reviewed by more companies overall?
Ubuntu was reviewed by 337 companies across 325 companies that did not also review Dynatrace, compared to 235 companies for Dynatrace.
Do Consulting & Analysis teams show different evaluation patterns?
Consulting & Analysis teams reviewed Ubuntu more frequently (56 reviewers) than Dynatrace (44 reviewers), reflecting different engagement models between the two products.

Keep reading

All comparisons